Brussels Faces Criticism Over Yet Another Deforestation Law Delay

Brussels Faces Criticism Over Yet Another Deforestation Law Delay

Procrastination Sep 26, 2025

The European Commission Proposes Another Year-Long Wait

In a surprising twist, Brussels has once again decided to propose a delay in its deforestation law, aiming to extend the implementation deadline to 31 December 2026. According to Eunews, although justified by the Commission as a technical necessity due to IT system concerns, many view this delay as another procrastination tactic.

A Law with Environmental and Economic Stakes

Environment Commissioner Jessica Roswall’s announcement revealed that the IT system required for the law’s implementation is overwhelmed by data volumes ten times larger than expected. This legislation was designed to curb products linked to forest overexploitation by increasing supply chain controls.

Polarized Positions: Economy vs. Environment

The delay has amplified the divide within the European Parliament. The European People’s Party supports the move, advocating for simplification and highlighting the burdens on EU farmers. Meanwhile, Socialists argue the flimsy technical pretext undermines fair competition and environmental integrity across sustainable businesses.

Efforts for Simplification and System Improvements

Earlier efforts in April aimed at reducing corporate burdens by 30% have seen little traction. Despite this, there is a call for further simplification of obligations, a sentiment echoed by industry organizations such as Confagricoltura and Federlegno.

Political Consequences and Future Prospects

The delay has repercussions beyond policy as it influences political coalitions, with the potential to destabilize the pro-European parliamentary majority supporting Ursula von der Leyen. Upcoming non-confidence motions in the European Parliament add another layer of complexity to this unfolding situation.

A Path Forward

While enhancing IT system capacity remains critical, balancing company obligations to prevent significant administrative burdens is equally vital. As debates continue, Brussels finds itself at a critical crossroad that could shape EU environmental policy for years to come.

Tags