OSP's Firm Stance Against Claims of Vendetta in Ofori-Atta Probe

OSP's Firm Stance Against Claims of Vendetta in Ofori-Atta Probe

Motivation Jun 24, 2025

A Public Denial of Vendetta Claims

The Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) has publicly countered allegations made by Professor Ransford Gyampo, the Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Ghana Shippers Authority. In a firm rebuttal, the OSP addressed Prof. Gyampo’s insinuations during his TV interview that the investigation into former Finance Minister Kenneth Ofori-Atta was driven by personal vendetta rather than justice. The OSP firmly dismissed these claims, emphasizing the legitimacy and legal foundation of their investigations.

Grounds for the Investigation

The OSP’s actions against Mr. Ofori-Atta are rooted in significant allegations of corruption, notably surrounding a multi-year contract with Strategic Mobilization Limited. According to Pulse Ghana, the agency’s commitment to transparency and justice guides its operations, directly countering Prof. Gyampo’s comments that challenged the integrity of the OSP’s motives.

Revealing a Hidden Dynamic

Significant details emerged as the OSP revealed that Prof. Gyampo attempted to contact them during an ongoing investigation involving National Security. This action suggests a deeper connection to the case, raising questions about the appropriateness of such interference in active legal processes. The OSP sees this as an attempt to shift the narrative and publicly discredit its operations.

Upholding Institutional Integrity

The OSP reiterated its dedication to maintaining objectivity and integrity in all anti-corruption investigations. By focusing on evidence-based proceedings, the agency seeks to bolster public trust in its mission. Furthermore, the timeliness of Prof. Gyampo’s remarks raises questions about the propriety of commenting on affairs where potential conflicts of interest may arise.

Calls for Responsible Commentary

In its public response, the OSP emphasized the need for careful dialogue from public figures while investigations are underway. It highlighted the risk that irresponsible remarks could undermine the anti-corruption efforts crucial to Ghana’s future. This warning serves as a caution to ensure that Ghana’s legal framework stands resilient against undue influence or rash public commentary that could compromise justice.

The engagement of all involved parties will be crucial as Ghana continues to navigate these complex issues, ensuring that transparency, justice, and public confidence remain central in their efforts to combat corruption at all levels.

Tags