2 min read

Tracking Underground Tests with Precision

Tracking Underground Tests with Precision
Photo by Maxim Hopman / Unsplash

For a considerable period, many countries around the globe have concealed their tests of weapons of mass destruction, masking them as natural underground disturbances. However, a recent development by scientists threatens to put an end to this practice. Since the dawn of the atomic age, marked by the creation of the first atomic bomb in 1945, over 2000 nuclear tests have been conducted worldwide, including by nations such as North Korea, testing their nuclear capabilities. Despite efforts by organizations like the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) aimed at monitoring such tests, modern nuclear experiments typically take place underground, making them challenging to detect except through seismic waves. But a new development by scientists promises to uncover any covert weapons of mass destruction tests.

A recent study has presented society with an innovative method that distinguishes natural earthquakes from secret underground nuclear tests with staggering accuracy—close to 99 percent.

Historically, nuclear testing has led to devastating environmental and social consequences, with radioactive fallout affecting regions far beyond the testing sites. Initial atmospheric tests resulted in massive environmental contamination, leading to agreements to conduct underground tests to reduce radioactive fallout.

Monitoring these tests involves a range of sophisticated methods, including airborne sampling stations, hydroacoustic listening posts, infrasound detectors, and seismometers measuring seismic waves generated by underground explosions. However, distinguishing these artificial disturbances from natural earthquakes is a challenging task, akin to finding a needle in a planetary haystack.

Traditional monitoring methods, such as analyzing the location and depth of seismic events, have their limitations, as nuclear tests can strategically occur in seismically active regions or at depths mimicking natural earthquakes. More advanced methods, such as analyzing the distribution of energy between body and surface waves, have proven effective but not infallible, as evidenced by past failures in classifying some nuclear tests.

As a result of a significant breakthrough, researchers from the Australian National University and Los Alamos National Laboratory, led by Dr. Mark Hoggard, have developed a new approach to classifying seismic events based on the behavior of rock formations at the source of underground disturbances. By combining this approach with advanced statistical models, they achieved a classification accuracy of around 99 percent when testing seismic data collected in the Western United States.

This research provides the world with a promising tool to enhance global monitoring efforts, ensuring greater accountability for the environmental and social consequences of nuclear testing. Reliable methods for identifying these tests will remain vital components of international monitoring programs, safeguarding against the clandestine proliferation of nuclear weapons and associated risks to humanity.

Previously, Focus has written about how the father of the atomic bomb expressed remorse for his actions. Against the backdrop of the upcoming release of Christopher Nolan's film "Oppenheimer," there is still a surge of interest in the historical figure central to the work—J. Robert Oppenheimer.

Focus has also explored the effects of beryllium disease on the human body. Beryllium (Be), a lesser-known element compared to hydrogen, oxygen, sodium, and potassium, plays a crucial role in various everyday items. It is used in aircraft, automobiles, phones, and countless everyday objects. But the element is incredibly hazardous in the process.