UK's 'Policy Procrastination' Leaves It Laggard in Global Crypto Race

UK's 'Policy Procrastination' Leaves It Laggard in Global Crypto Race

Procrastination Jun 28, 2025

In a rapidly evolving digital finance landscape, the UK finds itself lagging behind the European Union and the United States. Amidst a chorus of concerned market participants, the call of “policy procrastination” echoes loudly. According to Cointelegraph, what once seemed like an impending gold standard for post-Brexit digital asset regulation, now feels like missed opportunities.

UK’s Early Advantage Fades

The UK held a promising early-mover advantage in distributed ledger finance, setting clear-eyed sights on becoming a beacon for crypto regulations. Yet, in the eyes of John Orchard and Lewis McLellan from the Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum (OMFIF), the UK has let this opportunity slip away. Their recent blog lamented the country’s inability to translate prospective guidelines into tangible regulatory action.

Orchard and McLellan’s argument highlights a key shortcoming: the elusive “Regime go-live” date in the Financial Conduct Authority’s ‘Crypto Roadmap,’ which still lingers somewhere beyond 2026. Such delays, they say, hinder the nation’s ability to embrace a finance world rapidly transitioning on-chain.

EU and US Advance Forward

Contrasting with the UK’s sluggish progress, other key players have leaped ahead. The European Union’s comprehensive Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework is already active, creating a cohesive regulatory playground. Meanwhile, across the Atlantic, the US has ratified the groundbreaking Genius Act, pioneering federal stablecoin guidelines. These actions place both regions as front-runners in sculpting the future of digital finance.

The UK’s Stablecoin Struggle

The UK’s tangled approach toward stablecoins aggravates its regulatory lag. Differing significantly from the US’s treatment of stablecoins as unique payment tools, UK authorities have bundled them with broader crypto investment assets. This muddling approach not only confused the market but was also a disservice to potential innovation.

Compounding anxieties, the Bank of England initially sought to restrict systemic stablecoins to central bank-backed assets, a move heavily criticized by industry stakeholders. Despite some softening of this stance, a finalized, feasible model remains absent.

Global Inspiration and Urgent Action

While the UK treads uncertain waters, jurisdictions like Hong Kong and the United Arab Emirates surge ahead, implementing pioneering frameworks and fostering robust digital ecosystems. The UAE’s dedicated Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) exemplifies a streamlined approach, avoiding the pitfalls of adapting old institutions to new paradigms.

As the decade matures, the urgency for the UK to act intensifies. Blocked by its indecision, questions loom regarding whether its reign in fintech innovation can outlast this period of dormancy.

In the corridors of power, a burning reminder persists—financial centers rise and fall. Orchards ring a clarion call for decisive action, encouraging regulators to embrace the dawning digital era before the opportunities that still exist fade entirely.

Tags