Wike Challenges NBA: Is Conference Sponsorship the Real Motive Behind Criticism?

Wike Challenges NBA: Is Conference Sponsorship the Real Motive Behind Criticism?

Motivation Mar 31, 2025

In a fiery statement that has shaken the legal community, Nyesom Wike, Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, has lambasted the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) for opposing the emergency rule in Rivers State. Wike claims the opposition stems from the NBA’s financial interests, specifically related to conference sponsorship.

Allegations of Financial Motivation

Speaking in Abuja to the Body of Benchers, Wike accused the NBA of hypocrisy, suggesting their criticism of the emergency rule is financially driven. Wike stated, “The NBA is against the state of emergency because there would be no money to give them for their conference.” This bold assertion raises questions about the integrity of the NBA’s stance.

Criticism Unread: A Call for Accountability

Wike’s critique didn’t stop there; he denounced NBA members for condemning Supreme Court rulings without even reading them, describing such acts as “unfortunate”. He urged the Body of Benchers to discipline those spreading uninformed criticisms. “If you don’t discipline somebody, nobody will learn any lesson,” Wike emphasized.

The speech also highlighted a perceived double standard within the legal community. Wike, a lawyer himself, faced backlash for contributing to the legal profession. He noted that financial contributions to certain legal bodies are questioned as briberies, yet similar contributions to the NBA are not met with the same skepticism. Wike’s assertion that “We shall no longer allow our profession to be pulled down” resonates within broader legal conversations about ethics and financial influence. As stated in TheCable, the FCT Minister continues to defend the judiciary’s integrity.

Accusations of Hypocrisy and Financial Dependency

Wike accused the NBA of hypocrisy for accepting executive support in the past while framing similar support for the judiciary as corrupt. “When you contribute to the Body of Benchers, it is a bribe, but when you contribute to the NBA, it is not a bribe—they will take it!” he argued, shedding light on the complexities of financial influence in legal affairs.

Nyesom Wike’s confrontation opens a much-needed dialogue on the motivations and ethical issues within the legal sector, igniting a debate that might transform the future of the legal profession in Nigeria.

Tags